20 Best Manatal Alternatives in 2026 (Expert Recommended)

Detailed Reviews: Top 10 Manatal Competitors in 2026

Our detailed reviews cover their features, pricing, clear pros & cons, and an expert's take to help you select the best Manatal alternative.

1. Skima AI

Skima AI is an AI recruitment software that either replaces Manatal entirely or sits on top of it as an “intelligence layer.”

Instead of forcing you to rebuild your stack, Skima AI plugs into Manatal to rediscover, screen, match with explainable AI, and engage candidates.

It plugs into your system and makes your historical and active candidate data actually usable in day-to-day hiring. That makes it particularly attractive for teams that feel “data rich, insight poor” inside tools like Manatal.

Key Features of Skima AI

Below are the notable features of Skima AI, one of the top Manatal competitors:

• AI Talent Search: Conduct semantic and skills-based searches across ATS, CRM, and external pools. This helps recruiters move beyond simple keyword searches.
• Explainable AI Match Scores: Every candidate receives a clear match score. This score shows evidence of skills directly from their resume and profile.
• Multi-source Aggregation: Connects with ATS, CRM, HRIS, and external sources to create unified talent profiles instead of having scattered records.
• Engagement Workflows: Provides cadences, templates, and personalisation. Sourcers can perform multi-touch outreach directly from the platform.
• Hiring Team Insights: Delivers analytics on pipeline health, response rates, and the origins of strong candidates.
• Layered on ATS: Acts as an overlay, allowing you to keep your ATS while Skima manages intelligence, search, and engagement.
• Multi‑Channel Outreach Campaigns: Automates personalised sequences across email, SMS, calls, and LinkedIn, with follow-ups based on behaviour.

Skima AI Pricing

Pros of Skima AI

• Strong semantic search and matching make existing ATS data far more usable day-to-day.
• Integrates with multiple ATS and HR tools instead of forcing a rip-and-replace.
• Designed for high-volume sourcing and outbound engagement, not just basic tracking.
• Helps reduce external job board spend by maximizing internal and past candidate pools.​
• Modern UX that’s easier for sourcers to live in compared with legacy ATS UIs.

Cons of Skima AI

Best value when you lean into AI workflows. Teams that only want a basic ATS may not fully utilise its matching and campaigns.

Our Take

Skima AI is a strong fit if Manatal’s basic AI suggestions feel shallow and you’re tired of re-sourcing roles you’ve already hired for.

It’s best for teams that want to keep their existing ATS but add a serious intelligence layer for search, matching, and engagement at scale. Very small teams that only hire occasionally may find the depth overkill.

2. Greenhouse

Greenhouse is a structured hiring powerhouse built for high-growth companies. It focuses on consistency, collaboration, and data-driven decisions in every role.

It addresses a key Manatal issue: when hiring goes global and cross-functional, you need strict workflows, not just simple pipelines. Greenhouse provides interview kits, scorecards, and governance to make this structure effective in practice.

Key Features of Greenhouse

Below are the core features of Greenhouse, one of the top Manatal alternatives:

• Structured Hiring: Role-specific interview plans, scorecards, and decision frameworks let leaders compare candidates fairly.
• Hiring Manager Collaboration: Clear tasking, feedback requests, and tailored hiring views reduce back-and-forth.
• Rich Integrations: A deep ecosystem connects HRIS, background checks, assessments, coding tests, and more.
• Advanced Reporting: Pipeline analytics, recruiter productivity views, and DEI reporting go beyond what Manatal offers.
• Multi-Entity Support: Ideal for companies with multiple brands, regions, or business units.
• Automation & SLAs: Triggers, reminders, and routing rules keep processes moving without manual follow-up.

Greenhouse Pricing

Greenhouse does not disclose specific pricing on its website. Instead, pricing is quote-based and depends on company size, product tier, and add-ons. The structure of the plans and the inclusions of each tier are publicly available.

Pros of Greenhouse

• Best-in-class structured hiring capabilities support consistent interviews and decisions at scale.
• Large integration marketplace reduces swivel-chairing between tools.
• Reporting and dashboards give leadership a clear view of bottlenecks and recruiter performance.
• Strong brand reputation, community, and implementation partners in the mid-market and enterprise.

Cons of Greenhouse

• Can feel heavy for small teams that just need a simple ATS.
• Implementation and configuration take time and internal ownership.
• Some power reports and analytics require additional configuration or support to fully unlock.

Our Take

Choose Greenhouse if you find Manatal lacks structure, reporting depth, or strong integrations.

It's great for high-growth teams across multiple countries that view recruiting as a serious business process. Very small companies or those without a dedicated TA function might find it too complex and costly.

3. Workable

Workable is an all-in-one ATS built to be “the recruiter’s daily home,” especially for SMBs and mid-market teams that want strong sourcing, plus simple workflows.

It’s a good move when Manatal’s AI and job-board posting feel basic, but you’re not ready for the overhead of an enterprise ATS. Workable’s UI, templates, and native tools make it easy to move fast without a long rollout.

Key Features of Workable

Below are the standout features of Workable, one of the best Manatal competitors:

• Multi-Board Posting: Post to major job boards and social channels with one click. Enjoy strong localisation options.
• Built-in Sourcing: Use candidate databases and Chrome extensions to find and add passive talent.
• Hiring Collaboration: Engage hiring managers with comments, mentions, and scorecards within the platform.
• Automation Rules: Set up auto-emails, stage moves, and disqualification rules to reduce repetitive admin tasks.
• Templates & Guides: Access job descriptions, email, and interview templates so teams can avoid starting from scratch.
• Mobile-Friendly Tools: Use apps and mobile-optimised flows that keep recruiters productive while on the go.

Workable Pricing

Pros of Workable

• Very approachable UI with a shallow learning curve for new recruiters and hiring managers.
• Strong balance between sourcing tools, job distribution, and core ATS workflows.
• Public, self-serve pricing makes it easier for SMBs to budget and get started.
• Scales reasonably well into mid-market before you need something more enterprise-focused.

Cons of Workable

• Less suited for very complex, multi-brand, or highly regulated enterprise environments.
• Reporting and analytics, while decent, aren’t as deep as best-of-breed enterprise suites.
• Heavy reliance on built-in templates may encourage process sameness if you don’t customize.

Our Take

Workable is a strong Manatal alternative if you like Manatal’s ease-of-use but want a sharper sourcing engine and more polished collaboration.

It’s best for small and mid-market teams that want to get serious about recruiting without the overhead of a full enterprise platform. Very large or highly complex organizations will likely outgrow it over time.

4. Lever

Lever (often positioned as LeverTRM) combines ATS and CRM into one platform. This lets you manage recruiting as an ongoing relationship, not just a list of applicants.

It directly addresses a common Manatal limitation: once you start building talent pools and nurturing silver medalists, a basic ATS isn’t enough. Lever makes it easier to run outbound and inbound strategies in a single system.

Key Features of Lever

Below are the notable features of Lever, one of the best Manatal alternatives:

• ATS + CRM in One: A single candidate profile across applications, pipelines, and nurture campaigns.
• Talent Pipelines: Ongoing pipelines and pools, not just job-specific candidates.
• Nurture Campaigns: Email sequences with personalization and scheduling for continuous candidate engagement.
• Rich Analytics: Funnel, source, and recruiter performance metrics to help you optimise investments.
• Sourcing Extensions: Browser tools to add prospects from LinkedIn and the open web.
• Collaboration Tools: Interview feedback, scorecards, and scheduling to keep hiring teams in sync.

Lever Pricing

Lever does not publish specific pricing numbers on its website. Instead, it offers custom quotes based on company size and hiring needs. The platform offers two main tiers: LeverTRM and LeverTRM for Enterprise.

Pros of Lever

• True ATS+CRM model is powerful for teams that lean heavily on outbound and talent pooling.
• Strong sourcing and nurturing tools reduce dependence on separate recruitment CRM tools.
• Candidate history and engagement data live in one record, improving context for every outreach.
• Solid mid-market reputation with many tech and SaaS companies.

Cons of Lever

• Overkill for teams that rely mostly on inbound applicants and don’t nurture talent pools.
• Some users report a learning curve for reporting and CRM-style features.
• Advanced configuration often needs thoughtful admin ownership, not “set and forget.”

Our Take

Lever is a great choice if your frustration with Manatal is that it treats candidates as one-off applicants instead of long-term relationships.

It’s particularly strong for talent teams doing a lot of outbound and nurture-based recruiting. Teams with mostly transactional, inbound-heavy hiring may not fully exploit its CRM strengths.

5. Bullhorn

Bullhorn is a dominant ATS + CRM for staffing and recruiting agencies that live and die by speed, relationships, and sales activity.

Where Manatal is built primarily for in-house teams, Bullhorn is engineered around agency workflows, from sales pipelines to VMS integrations. If you run a recruitment business rather than an internal TA function, Bullhorn usually comes up early in the shortlist.

Key Features of Bullhorn

Here are the core features of Bullhorn, a leading alternative to Manatal:

• ATS + Sales CRM: Manage candidates, clients, and jobs in one system. Enjoy full activity tracking.
• Agency Workflows: Use built-in processes for job orders, submittals, placements, and commissions.
• VMS & Job Distribution: Integrate with VMS platforms and job boards popular in staffing.
• Bullhorn Automation: Automate follow-ups, reminders, and workflows for recruiter tasks.
• Strong Reporting: Access dashboards on jobs, submissions, fills, and recruiter performance.
• Marketplace Ecosystem: Benefit from a large partner network for assessments, back-office, and communications.

Bullhorn Pricing

Bullhorn uses custom, quote-based pricing and several editions (Front Office, Front Office + AI, Recruitment Cloud Workforce, etc.). You must request a quote for exact pricing and seat/license details.

Pros of Bullhorn

• Purpose-built for staffing and recruiting agencies, not retrofitted from in-house ATS models.
• Deep CRM and sales features help manage clients, contacts, and pipelines alongside candidates.
• Strong reporting on recruiter productivity and revenue-driving activity.
• Large ecosystem of agency-focused integrations and implementation partners.

Cons of Bullhorn

• Interface and workflows can feel heavy and complex, especially for new recruiters.
• Implementation and customization require serious time and internal champions.
• Overkill for in-house teams that don’t need agency-style sales pipelines.

Our Take

Choose Bullhorn if you're an agency or staffing firm outgrowing Manatal’s in-house design. It excels in consolidating candidates, clients, and jobs while providing clear insights into revenue and recruiter performance.

6. Zoho Recruit

Zoho Recruit is a flexible ATS and recruitment CRM. It appeals cost-conscious teams that want automation and customization.

It’s widely used by staffing agencies and in-house teams that need configurable pipelines, resume parsing, and multi-channel sourcing in one system. It’s a great upgrade if Manatal’s workflows and analytics seem too rigid or shallow.

Key Features of Zoho Recruit

Here are the standout features of Zoho Recruit, a major competitor of Manatal:

• End-to-End ATS: Manage jobs, candidates, clients, and contacts all in one place. No need to juggle multiple tools.
• Custom Workflows: Configure pipelines, fields, and assignment rules to match your real recruiting process.
• Resume Parsing & Search: Automate resume parsing and use Boolean and semantic search across profiles and attachments.
• Multi-Channel Sourcing: Post jobs on boards, recruit via social media, and use source boosters to gather candidates in one pipeline.
• Reporting & Dashboards: Access prebuilt and custom reports. Track open roles, pipeline health, and recruiter performance through dashboards.
• Portals & Collaboration: Higher tiers offer client and candidate portals for feedback, status tracking, and improved communication.
• AI-Powered Features: Enjoy AI candidate matching, generative AI job description support, and automated matching on higher plans.

Zoho Recruit Pricing

Pros of Zoho Recruit

• Strong value for money; users frequently call out enterprise-style features at SMB-friendly pricing.
• Good resume parsing and sourcing tools reduce manual data entry and job board hopping.
• Broad integration ecosystem across email, calendars, job boards, and other Zoho apps.
• Configurable workflows and dashboards help recruiters align the system to their niche and KPIs.​

Cons of Zoho Recruit

• Initial setup and configuration can feel complex if you want to fully leverage automation and customizations.
• UI and UX are sometimes described as dated or cluttered compared with newer, more visual tools.
• AI and parsing are helpful but not perfect; edge-case resumes often still need manual review.
• Some valuable features (portals, advanced analytics, certain AI options) are gated behind higher-priced tiers.​

Our Take

Zoho Recruit is a smart alternative to Manatal for teams mindful of costs. It suits small agencies and in-house teams willing to invest time for long-term flexibility.

However, very small teams that dislike configuration or large enterprises needing a polished user experience might want to consider other options.

7. Ceipal

Ceipal is an AI-driven talent platform for staffing firms, GCCs, and large recruiting teams. It combines ATS, CRM, VMS, and workforce management in one system.

This platform helps agencies manage candidates, clients, vendors, and internal workers all in one place. It relies heavily on automation and AI matching. If Manatal feels too “in-house only” for your staffing workflows, Ceipal is often one of the first platforms to evaluate.

Key Features of Ceipal

Below are the notable features of Ceipal, one of the top Manatal competitors:

• ATS + CRM Combo: Integrates applicant tracking with a full CRM. This lets you manage candidates, clients, and job orders together.
• AI Candidate Matching: Employs AI to rank candidates. It suggests the best fits based on job requirements and past placements.
• Automation & Workflows: Streamlines tasks like resume parsing, outreach, and interview scheduling. This helps you manage higher volumes effectively.
• VMS & Workforce Management: Features built-in vendor management and workforce modules for both contingent and full-time workers.
• Extensive Integrations: Links with major job boards, VMSs, email, calendars, CRMs, and video platforms such as Zoom and Teams.
• Dashboards & Reporting: Displays real-time dashboards on recruiter activity, pipelines, placements, and overall performance.
• Mobile Apps: Offers native apps to help recruiters manage jobs, candidates, and communications while on the move.

Ceipal Pricing

Ceipal does not publish plans and pricing details for the full ATS product on the website. Most enterprise features and ATS licensing are quoted via demo/sales conversations.

Pros of Ceipal

• Very feature-rich for staffing agencies, with ATS, CRM, VMS, and workforce management in one platform.
• Strong automation tools and AI matching help recruiters move faster on high-volume reqs.
• Broad integration coverage across job boards, VMS, and communication tools reduces manual work.
• User reviews often highlight good value for money compared with more expensive agency-focused platforms.

Cons of Ceipal

• Reporting and data export have been described as limited or clunky in some real-world implementations.​
• Custom branding and certain UI customizations are less flexible than some competitors.
• Integrations can be powerful but sometimes feel rough around the edges or require extra support to stabilize.
• Data migration and initial implementation have been painful for some teams, especially when importing from CSV and legacy tools.

Our Take

Ceipal is a viable alternative to Manatal for staffing or consulting businesses needing ATS, CRM, and workforce management. Teams valuing extensive features and automation should consider it alongside Bullhorn before making a commitment.

8. Breezy HR

Breezy HR is a simple, drag-and-drop ATS for small and mid-sized businesses. It helps users move away from spreadsheets without needing a big enterprise platform.

Its pipeline views, scheduling, and collaboration tools keep hiring managers involved, not just recruiters. For teams that find Manatal “a bit much” but still want structured hiring, Breezy’s lighter approach can be attractive.

Key Features of Breezy HR

Below are the core features of Breezy HR, one of the top Manatal alternatives:

• Kanban-Style Pipelines: Easy drag-and-drop candidate pipelines help hiring managers act quickly.
• Built-In Scheduling: Calendar integrations and scheduling tools manage interviews and reminders within Breezy.
• Job Posting & Sourcing: Share job postings and use candidate sourcing tools to centralise applications.
• Team Collaboration: Quickly get feedback from interviewers with comments, mentions, and shared views.
• Automation Basics: Use automated emails, stage-change triggers, and templates for common messages.
• Reporting & Analytics: Access core reports on pipeline, time-to-hire, and source performance, though depth is limited.
• Responsive Support: Many reviewers praise the helpful and responsive account teams.

Breezy HR Pricing

Pros of Breezy HR

• Frequently praised for being extremely easy to use, even for non-recruiters.
• Visual pipelines and clean UI make it simple to see where every candidate stands.
• Responsive customer support and onboarding assistance are highlighted positively by many users.
• Free Bootstrap plan and clear pricing lower the barrier to moving off spreadsheets or basic tools.
• Good fit for small HR teams that want to centralize hiring without complex configuration.

Cons of Breezy HR

• Reporting and analytics are often described as shallow, with limited customization options.
• Customization limits on workflows and data fields can frustrate more advanced teams.
• Job board coverage and integrations may not match more enterprise-focused ATS vendors.
• Larger or multi-entity organizations may quickly outgrow its capabilities and need something more robust.

Our Take

Breezy HR is a good Manatal alternative if you’re a small business or lean HR team and want something friendlier and lighter.

It’s ideal if your priority is giving hiring managers a visual, low-friction way to move candidates along. However, fast-scaling companies that care about advanced analytics, deep integrations, or complex workflows will likely hit Breezy’s ceiling quickly.

9. BambooHR

BambooHR is first and foremost an HRIS, with an ATS/hiring module layered on top so you can manage employees and candidates in one system.

It targets small and mid-sized businesses that want to streamline core HR, time-off, and basic recruiting without using multiple tools. For teams using Manatal for HR, BambooHR can simplify things by centralising employee data, onboarding, and hiring.

Key Features of BambooHR

Below are the standout features of BambooHR, one of the best Manatal competitors:

• Core HR + ATS: Combines employee records, PTO, and HR workflows with hiring tools.
• Simple Applicant Tracking: Job postings, basic pipelines, and easy candidate communication.
• Onboarding Workflows: Built-in forms, tasks, and checklists for smooth new hire onboarding.
• Employee Self-Service: Portals for employees to manage personal info, PTO, and documents.
• Reporting & Dashboards: HR and hiring reports to track headcount, turnover, and metrics.
• Integrations: Connectors to payroll, performance tools, and other HR add-ons to expand the suite.

BambooHR Pricing

​BambooHR provides a public starting price, but you need a custom quote to get the full pricing details. Before committing, confirm the final costs with BambooHR sales, including modules, payroll, seat counts, and integrations.

Pros of BambooHR

• Strong all-in-one HR foundation for small and mid-sized companies that want HRIS + basic ATS.
• Clean, approachable UI that non-technical HR and managers typically learn quickly.​
• Integrated onboarding and employee data reduces duplicate entry between ATS and HR systems.
• Good fit for organizations standardizing HR from spreadsheets or legacy on-prem tools.

Cons of BambooHR

• The hiring module is more basic than dedicated ATS platforms and may not support complex workflows.
• Not ideal for high-volume recruiting or sophisticated sourcing.
• Pricing for ATS functionality is bundled into a broader HR package, which can feel expensive if you only need recruiting.
• Customization and deep recruiting analytics are limited relative to specialized ATS competitors.

Our Take

BambooHR is a solid Manatal alternative if your main issue is fragmented HR data, not just ATS features. It suits SMBs that need one system for both employees and candidates and have straightforward hiring needs.

However, recruiting teams that use their ATS all day or hire in large numbers should choose a platform focused on recruiting.

10. iCIMS

iCIMS is an enterprise-grade talent acquisition suite built for large, often global organizations that need a deeply configurable, compliance-heavy ATS. It handles high-volume requisitions, complex approval flows, and multi-region hiring rules.

Compared with Manatal, iCIMS brings far more configurability, integrations, and governance. However, it also comes with added complexity and a heavier implementation process.

Key Features of iCIMS

Below are the notable features of iCIMS, one of the best Manatal alternatives:

• Enterprise ATS: Strong applicant tracking that supports complex roles, approvals, and compliance workflows.
• Talent Acquisition Suite: Includes modules for career sites, CRM, onboarding, and internal mobility, all built on the core ATS.
• Global Compliance & Localization: Offers tools for regional compliance, languages, and data residency needs.
• Integration Ecosystem: Features a broad partner network covering HRIS, assessments, background checks, and more.
• Advanced Analytics: Provides enterprise reporting on recruiting funnels, sources, and recruiter performance.
• Scalability & Performance: Designed to manage high volumes of applicants and users across multiple business units.

iCIMS Pricing

​iCIMS does not publish standard list prices for its Talent Cloud on its public site. You need to contact sales for custom quotes and scope-based pricing.

Pros of iCIMS

• Very strong fit for large enterprises with complex global recruiting needs.
• Deep configurability and compliance features support strict governance and audit requirements.
• Broad integration marketplace reduces manual work across background checks, HRIS, and assessments.
• Scales to high requisition volumes and large hiring teams across multiple business units.

Cons of iCIMS

• Implementation is significant and requires strong internal ownership and change management.
• Quote-based, enterprise pricing is typically far above SMB-focused ATS tools like Manatal.
• Admin and user complexity can be overkill for smaller or less mature TA functions.
• UI and speed are sometimes viewed as less modern compared with newer cloud-native competitors.

Our Take

iCIMS serves as a suitable Manatal alternative for enterprises requiring global governance, integrations, and compliance.

However, SMBs and many mid-market companies may find its cost and complexity excessive, benefiting more from options like Greenhouse or Lever.

10 Additional Manatal Alternatives

Below are 10 more alternatives to Manatal. Compare the ideal for, trial info, and key differentiators: