20 Best Greenhouse Alternatives 2026 (120 Hours of Research)

Detailed Reviews: Top 10 Greenhouse Competitors in 2026

Our research team spent over 120 hours evaluating the market to identify the top 20 Greenhouse Alternatives. Our detailed reviews cover their features, pricing, clear pros & cons, and our opinion to help you select the best alternative.

1. Skima AI

Skima AI is a recruiter-centric, end-to-end AI recruitment platform purpose-built for teams that source, screen, and engage talent at scale. Unlike traditional ATSs, Skima treats AI not as an add-on but as the core engine.

Proprietary AI models power every candidate search, resume parse, and match score trained on millions of resumes. It integrates seamlessly with your existing ATS or standalone, serving recruitment agencies, talent acquisition teams, and enterprises.

Key Features of Skima AI

Below are the notable features of Skima AI, one of the top Greenhouse competitors:

• AI Matching Score with Explainability: Candidates ranked by fit with transparent reasoning showing why they match the role.
• AI Resume Parsing: Extracts 200+ data points from resumes automatically; identifies skill evidence from work history, not just buzzwords.
• Talent Rediscovery: Automatically surface past applicants and internal candidates now qualified for new roles without reposting.
• Omnichannel Outreach: Automated campaigns via email, SMS, LinkedIn, and calls with real-time AI analysis of responses.
• Pipeline Management & ATS Integration: Standalone ATS or integrates with Greenhouse, Lever, Salesforce, HubSpot, and 130+ tools.
• Enterprise Security: GDPR compliant, SOC 2 certified, on-premises deployment option for large organizations.

Skima AI Pricing

Pros of Skima AI

• 5X Faster Resume Screening: Users report that 85% see a multiplied ROI in months. Talent rediscovery alone cuts screening time by 50%.
• Purple Squirrel Matching: The AI finds candidates that traditional keyword searches often miss. Its transparent match reasoning makes decisions easy to defend.
• No Need for a Second Platform: Skima AI works within your existing ATS. This means no data exports, separate logins, or complex integrations.
• Enterprise-Grade Security: It's SOC 2 certified and GDPR compliant. An on-premises option is available for regulated industries.
• Recruiter-First Design: Built by recruiters for recruiters, it has a minimal learning curve compared to heavy enterprise platforms.

Cons of Skima AI

• Premium Pricing for Startups: At $49/user/month, small teams (1–3 recruiters) may find more budget-friendly ATS-only alternatives.

Our Take

Skima AI is the best choice if you're a recruitment agency, high-volume hiring team, or enterprise tired of manual screening and resume re-parsing. It directly solves Greenhouse's resume parsing weakness and automates the hours-long screening work.

Choose Skima AI if speed and AI-driven accuracy matter more than out-of-the-box simplicity. Skip it if you're a solo founder with occasional hiring needs or are searching for the cheapest ATS without AI capabilities.

2. Lever

Lever is an ATS + CRM hybrid designed to combine applicant tracking with relationship-driven recruiting.

Unlike Greenhouse's structured, process-centric approach, Lever emphasizes candidate relationships. It tracks interactions, builds talent pools, and nurtures prospects over months or years.

Key Features of Lever

Below are the core features of Lever, one of the top Greenhouse alternatives:

• Integrated CRM: Candidate nurture campaigns, talent pools, and relationship tracking; move prospects through multi-stage pipelines without hard interview stages.
• Interview Coordination: One-click Zoom/Google Meet scheduling; candidate availability syncs across your team; no more scheduling conflicts.
• Customizable Pipelines: Define hiring stages unique to each role type; workflows adapt to your process, not the reverse.
• AI-Powered Interview Insights: AI transcribes, summarizes, and generates talking points from recorded interviews; automatically flags key moments.
• Slack Integration: Real-time notifications, candidate feedback, and interview updates flow into Slack; stay coordinated without switching tabs.
• Native Job Board Posting: Post to 500+ job boards directly from Lever; track which sources bring the best hires.
• Reporting & Analytics: Custom reporting; see conversion rates, time-to-hire, cost-per-hire, and hiring manager effectiveness.

Lever Pricing

Lever does not publish specific pricing numbers on its website. Instead, it offers custom quotes based on company size and hiring needs. The platform offers two main tiers: LeverTRM and LeverTRM for Enterprise.

Pros of Lever

• Intuitive UX Built by Recruiters: The clean interface needs little training. Hiring managers and recruiters can use it right away, avoiding onboarding chaos.
• CRM-first Relationship Building: Unlike ATS-only tools, Lever sees candidates as long-term prospects. Nurture campaigns and talent pools help cut reposting costs.
• AI Interview Summaries Save Time: Automatic transcription, summaries, and feedback forms remove the need for manual note-taking after calls.
• Fast Implementation and Migration Support: The cloud-native setup ensures smooth data migration from Greenhouse or old ATSs. The implementation team is responsive.
• Exceptional Customer Support: Users often praise Lever's support team for being responsive, thorough during onboarding, and helpful ongoing.

Cons of Lever

• Pricing Not Transparent: Quote-based pricing complicates budgeting for SMBs. Final costs depend on seat count, modules, and negotiation. There is also no free trial.
• Advanced Features Carry Add-On Costs: Custom reporting, AI insights, and some automation features are premium add-ons. Smaller teams may be surprised by the total cost.
• Customer Support Fatigue Reported: Some users mention declining support responsiveness in recent reviews. Early response times were excellent, but changes in the support structure have affected this.

Our Take

Lever is ideal for mid-market and scaling companies that prioritize candidate relationships and efficiency. Its CRM approach enhances manager engagement, improving decision quality. However, avoid it if you need transparent pricing or extensive automation.

3. Ashby

Ashby is a modern, all-in-one recruiting platform built for ambitious startups and fast-growing tech teams. It combines ATS, CRM, sourcing, scheduling, analytics, and offer management into a single product that feels lightweight yet powerful.

The interface is clean, the onboarding is fast, and the reporting dashboards are considered best-in-class across the industry.

Key Features of Ashby

Below are the standout features of Ashby, one of the best Greenhouse competitors:

• All-in-One Platform: ATS, CRM, sourcing automation, interview scheduling, offer management, and analytics in one product; no stack switching.
• Candidate Intelligence & Matching: Resume parsing, skill extraction, and ranked matching; find the best candidates without manual screening.
• Workflow Automation: Set up automated workflows (send feedback forms after interviews, schedule follow-ups, move candidates through stages) without code.
• Interview Recording & AI Notes: Record interviews (candidates can opt out), auto-generate summaries and transcripts; AI highlights key moments and flags cultural misalignments.
• Career Site Builder: No-code site builder; publish a branded career page without developer help.
• Real-Time Analytics: Dashboards show pipeline health, funnel conversion, time-to-hire, and recruiting team performance.
• Integrations: Integrates with 150+ tools, including Slack, Zoom, LinkedIn, Calendly, Plane, GitHub, and more.

Ashby Pricing

Pros of Ashby

• Fast Onboarding: You can set up and customise in just days. Existing Greenhouse data migrates easily.
• Outstanding Analytics Dashboards: Reporting is visual, adaptable, and easy to use. Users often prefer these dashboards over Greenhouse, Lever, and SmartRecruiters.
• AI-Powered Interview Notes: Record, transcribe, and auto-generate notes. Say goodbye to confusion about what candidates mentioned.
• Lightweight but Comprehensive: Combines ATS, CRM, sourcing, scheduling, and analytics without unnecessary features. You won’t get stuck with tools you don’t need.
• Quick Email Support: No live chat, but users report helpful responses within hours.

Cons of Ashby

• Lacks Multilingual Support: Primarily operates in English. International teams with multilingual candidates may need workarounds.
• Limited Customization Compared to Greenhouse: Workflows are smart but more opinionated. Complex, non-standard hiring processes may require adjustments.
• Reporting Glitches During Peak Hours: Some users notice delays or glitches when running complex reports during busy hiring times.

Our Take

Ashby is the best Greenhouse alternative for startups and mid-market companies that want one integrated platform, transparent pricing, and fast onboarding.

If you’re spending over $10K on Greenhouse for basic features, Ashby offers a comprehensive alternative for $300–$900/month, prioritizing speed and simplicity over extensive customisation.

4. SmartRecruiters

SmartRecruiters is an enterprise-grade talent acquisition platform. It combines ATS, CRM, AI-powered matching, job distribution, onboarding, and a marketplace of integrations.

Designed for large global organisations, it excels in collaborative workflows and multi-channel candidate sourcing. SmartRecruiters prioritizes custom workflows and dynamic job posting across 300+ boards, unlike Greenhouse.

Key Features of SmartRecruiters

Below are the notable features of SmartRecruiters, one of the best Greenhouse alternatives:

• AI Talent Matching Engine: Intelligent candidate matching using proprietary AI; highlights top fits without manual resume screening.
• Multi-Channel Job Distribution: Post to 300+ job boards, social platforms, and career sites with one click; track which sources drive highest-quality hires.
• Applicant Tracking System (ATS): Core job posting, application management, pipeline tracking, and candidate evaluation.
• Candidate Relationship Management (CRM): Talent pools, nurture campaigns, and prospect tracking for passive candidates.
• AI-Powered Candidate Screening: Conversational AI asks questions, evaluates responses, and ranks candidates automatically.
• Onboarding Module: Pre-hire, day-one, and post-hire workflows; e-signatures, document collection, and new hire checklists.
• SmartOS Open Platform: 300+ integrations via marketplace; connect to HRIS (Workday, SAP, UKG), background checks, assessments, and more.
• Agency Portal: Support staffing and recruitment agency workflows; white-label career pages and collaboration.

SmartRecruiters Pricing

Pros of SmartRecruiters

• Enterprise-Grade Scale: Easily manages global hiring across multiple languages and time zones. Supports complex approval workflows and organisational hierarchies without issues.
• Transparent AI Candidate Screening: AI offers fair evaluations of candidates. Detailed scoring reveals why certain candidates are top fits, avoiding a black-box method.
• Multi-Channel Distribution Saves Time: Post jobs to 300+ boards, social media, and career sites all at once. Eliminates the need for manual reposting.
• Excellent Collaboration Tools: Hiring managers, recruiters, and interviewers collaborate effectively. Feedback collection and candidate rankings are visible to all.
• Compliance and Security: Adheres to global hiring regulations, including GDPR and local labour laws. Offers role-based permissions and audit trails for compliance in regulated sectors.

Cons of SmartRecruiters

• Complex Interface Can Overwhelm Small Teams: Many users find the extensive options intimidating. New users may need extra support for onboarding.
• Longer Implementation Timeline: Setting up SmartRecruiters takes weeks. This includes data migration and team training, leading to a slower time-to-value compared to Ashby's "days."
• Dashboard is Information-Dense: Some users say the dashboard feels "cluttered." Finding specific insights can take several clicks.
• Customer Support Availability Varies: Standard enterprise support is only during business hours. 24/7 support is available only for higher tiers.

Our Take

SmartRecruiters is ideal for enterprises with global hiring, complex workflows, and teams comfortable with platform customization.

Choose SmartRecruiters if hiring at a global scale, compliance, and multi-language support are non-negotiable. Avoid it if you're a startup seeking simplicity; the feature breadth and setup complexity aren't justified for occasional hiring.

5. iCIMS

iCIMS is an enterprise talent acquisition platform with deep roots in large-scale hiring. It combines ATS, CRM, onboarding, background check coordination, video interviewing, and SMS recruiting into a single platform.

iCIMS is built for enterprises that can't tolerate process chaos. It imposes structure, compliance, and audit trails across global, high-volume hiring.

Key Features of iCIMS

Here are the core features of iCIMS, a leading alternative to Greenhouse:

• Highly Customizable ATS: Workflow automation, custom fields, approval gates, and role-specific stages; adapts to any hiring process.
• Talent Cloud (ATS + CRM Integration): Unifies applicant tracking, candidate relationships, and talent pool nurturing in one system.
• Video Interviewing: Built-in video interviews and asynchronous candidate video responses; no Zoom dependency.
• SMS & Text Recruiting: Send campaigns via SMS; track engagement and automate follow-ups via text.
• Resume Parsing & AI Matching: Automatic skill extraction from resumes; AI-powered candidate ranking by fit.
• Onboarding Module: Pre-hire document collection, I-9 workflows, background check coordination, and day-one checklists.
• Enterprise Integrations: Native connectors to Workday, SAP, UKG, ADP, and 100+ HRIS and HCM systems.
• Compliance & Audit Trails: Full audit logging, role-based permissions, and support for multi-jurisdiction compliance (GDPR, FCRA, EEO).

iCIMS Pricing

iCIMS does not publish standard list prices for its Talent Cloud on its public site. You need to contact sales for custom quotes and scope-based pricing.

Official resources and vendor PDFs confirm pricing is typically contract-based and can include annual license fees plus one-time implementation/professional services.

Pros of iCIMS

• Integrated HRIS Connectivity: Works smoothly with Workday, SAP, UKG, and ADP. Candidate data flows directly into payroll without needing manual steps.
• Strong Compliance & Audit Features: Includes built-in compliance for GDPR, FCRA, EEO, and other regulations. This is vital for heavily regulated industries.
• Complete Onboarding Module: Handles pre-hire workflows, document collection, background checks, and I-9 management all in one system.
• Customizable for Enterprises: Offers extensive workflow customization, approval gates, and role-specific processes. It adapts to any hiring model.
• Global Support & Infrastructure: Aids hiring across various time zones and languages. Provides dedicated support for large accounts with service level agreements.

Cons of iCIMS

• Steep Learning Curve for Small Teams: The extensive customization needs support during setup. Onboarding can be harder than with Ashby or Lever.
• Dated UI Compared to Modern ATSs: The dashboard and workflows prioritise enterprise needs over recruiters. It's less intuitive than Ashby or Lever.
• Long Implementation Timeline: Expect 3-6 months for configuration, integration, data migration, and training. This leads to slower value than cloud-native platforms.
• Per-User and Module-Based Pricing: Costs can escalate quickly as hiring scales, user count rises, or more modules are added. It's tough to predict total expenses.

Our Take

iCIMS is ideal for large enterprises hiring globally, requiring HRIS integration and strict compliance. If moving from Greenhouse due to compliance issues, choose iCIMS. However, startups or mid-market teams should avoid it due to its complexity and cost.

6. Workable

Workable is an AI-powered ATS designed for scale. It offers applicant tracking, candidate sourcing, screening automation, HRIS basics, and onboarding in one integrated platform.

It emphasizes automation and ease-of-use without the complexity of enterprise platforms. Compared to Greenhouse's dense interface and hidden pricing, Workable offers transparent, published pricing and a clean, intuitive UI that requires minimal training.

Key Features of Workable

Here are the standout features of Workable, a major competitor of Greenhouse:

• Candidate Sourcing Suite: Access to a 260M candidate database; direct sourcing without job postings; AI-powered candidate suggestions.
• AI-Powered Screening: Conversational AI asks custom questions, evaluates responses automatically, and ranks candidates by fit.
• Interview Scheduling: One-click calendar integration; auto-schedule across multiple candidates and interviewers with conflict resolution.
• Applicant Tracking System (ATS): Job posting, application management, pipeline tracking, and hiring plan analytics.
• HRIS Basics: Employee onboarding, time tracking, time-off management, e-signatures, and payroll integrations.
• Native Video Interviews & Texting: Record interviews directly in-platform; send candidate updates via SMS.
• Assessments & Skills Tests: 500+ pre-built assessments for technical and soft skills screening.
• Hiring Plans & Analytics: Automated workflow triggers, hiring forecasts, and performance dashboards by role, team, or source.

Workable Pricing

Additional Details:

• Pricing scales with company size (larger teams pay more per employee tier).
• Premium tools (Video Interviews, Texting, Assessments) are available as add-ons for the standard plan for an extra fee.
• Free 15-day trial includes full product access.
• Custom enterprise pricing is available for large organizations.

Pros of Workable

• Transparent, Published Pricing: Workable shows costs upfront, unlike Greenhouse's quote model.  
• AI Screening Saves Time: Conversational AI cuts hours weekly per recruiter by eliminating manual reviews. Ranked candidates help hiring managers focus.  
• Clean, Intuitive Interface: The system is easy to use, needing little training. Hiring managers can start right away without onboarding issues.  
• Sourcing Database of Millions of Candidates: Direct sourcing means no job postings. This approach can cut hiring time by weeks compared to traditional methods.  
• Fast Customer Support: Users often praise the quick support. Implementation and onboarding take only days, not weeks.

Cons of Workable

• Pricing Increases with Headcount: Moving from 1-20 employees to 51-100 can be costly. Add-ons like video, texting, and assessments can quickly double expenses.
• Limited Reporting Flexibility: Basic native reports don't offer much. For advanced insights, you need Power BI, which adds complexity and cost.
• Interview Scheduling for Multi-Stage Panels: Scheduling panel interviews can feel clunky. You may need workarounds for more complex workflows.
• Limited Customization Compared to Enterprise Platforms: Workflows are set in ways that may not fit your needs. Non-standard hiring processes often require manual adjustments.
• Focus on HRIS Features: Some users feel that ATS innovation has slowed. Development seems to prioritise HR modules over deeper recruiting features.

Our Take

Workable is ideal for mid-market companies and enterprises seeking AI-driven screening and sourcing without Greenhouse's complexity. It's ideal for high-volume hiring but may not fit those needing extensive customization or non-standard workflows.

7. JazzHR

JazzHR is an affordable, lightweight ATS that offers unlimited users for a flat fee, unlike Greenhouse's per-seat pricing.

Designed for small teams and startups, JazzHR includes job posting, applicant tracking, interview scheduling, candidate screening, and integrations in three tiered plans.

Key Features of JazzHR

Below are the notable features of JazzHR, one of the top Greenhouse competitors:

• Unlimited User Accounts: All team members access the platform for one flat monthly fee (no per-seat pricing).
• Job Posting & Syndication: Post to free job boards, premium boards (Indeed, LinkedIn, ZipRecruiter), and social platforms from one place.
• Applicant Tracking System (ATS): Drag-and-drop pipeline, collaborative hiring, bulk candidate actions, and custom workflows.
• Interview Scheduling & Coordination: Interview scheduling, candidate availability syncing, and calendar integrations (Google, Outlook, Zoom).
• Custom Workflows & Automation: Build hiring stages, trigger automated emails, and create approval gates without coding.
• Candidate Texting: Send SMS updates, reminders, and offers directly to candidates; track engagement.
• Offers & eSignatures: Generate, send, and manage offer letters with digital signatures (Pro plan).
• Integrations Marketplace: 200+ pre-built integrations including Slack, Zoom, LinkedIn, and background check providers.

JazzHR Pricing

Pros of JazzHR

• Unlimited Users at a Flat Rate: The Hero plan allows unlimited team members. There are no hidden seat charges as your team grows. This is a game-changer for SMBs.
• Exceptional Affordability: Starting at £75/month (annual), this makes recruiting software accessible for solopreneurs and small teams. It's 1/10th the cost of Greenhouse.
• Live Phone Support and Training: Unlike Greenhouse's chat-only model, JazzHR offers responsive phone support and a useful tutorial library. Onboarding is thorough and hands-on.
• High Customisation for the Price Point: Workflows, custom fields, approval gates, and automation are flexible. Users often praise the ability to tailor the system to their needs.
• Responsive Product Team: Users find that feature requests are implemented quickly. There's an active product roadmap and ongoing customer feedback loops.

Cons of JazzHR

• Limited Reporting and Analytics: Reports are basic and inflexible. It's hard to pull useful data for recruiting without workarounds.
• Inefficient Candidate Tagging and Search: Finding candidates by custom attributes is tricky. Bulk search filters could be stronger.
• Limited Enterprise Features as You Scale: As companies grow, users often outgrow JazzHR's features. More complex workflows need manual fixes.

Our Take

JazzHR is the best choice for startups, SMBs, and agencies seeking cost-effective solutions without vendor lock-in. Ideal for teams of 5–20, it offers user-friendly software but may not meet needs for advanced reporting or heavy customization.

8. Recruitee

Recruitee is a collaborative ATS designed by recruiters, prioritizing simplicity, speed, and candidate experience. Unlike Greenhouse's rigid processes, it offers intuitive workflows, attractive career sites, and transparent pricing.

The platform unites ATS features, CRM capabilities, employer branding, custom hiring workflows, and over 120 integrations into one streamlined solution.

Key Features of Recruitee

Below are the core features of Recruitee, one of the top Greenhouse alternatives:

• Collaborative Hiring Platform: Real-time feedback from the hiring team, transparent candidate rankings, and collaborative notes without politics or friction.
• Career Site Builder (No Code): Build branded career pages without developer help; showcase company culture and attract passive candidates.
• Customizable Hiring Pipelines: Define stages unique to your roles; workflows adapt to your process, not the reverse.
• Applicant Tracking System (ATS): Job posting, application management, pipeline tracking, and unlimited candidates per plan.
• Candidate Relationship Management (CRM): Talent pools, nurture campaigns, and prospect tracking for passive candidates over months or years.
• Interview Scheduling & Coordination: Calendar integration, automated reminders, and candidate availability syncing.
• Employer Branding Tools: Company culture videos, team profiles, and job description templates to attract top talent.
• Integrations: 120+ pre-built integrations, including Slack, LinkedIn, Zapier, Google Meet, ADP, BambooHR, and more.
• Reporting & Analytics: Pipeline visibility, hiring metrics, and recruitment KPIs without data exports.

Recruitee Pricing

Pros of Recruitee

• Intuitive UX Requires Minimal Training: Hiring managers and recruiters can use it right away. No long implementation or "change management" needed.
• Built-in Employer Branding: The no-code career site builder and company profile tools make hiring more appealing. This also serves as a marketing asset.
• Collaborative Hiring Features: Feedback collection, candidate scoring, and team alignment occur naturally. There's no need to transfer feedback to spreadsheets.
• Excellent Customer Support: The responsive team offers proactive help and quickly implements features based on user feedback.
• Unlimited Users on All Plans: No extra charges for additional users. The entire team can access Recruitee at no extra cost.

Cons of Recruitee

• Limited Reporting Features: Pipeline tracking is available, but advanced analytics for recruiting ROI and hiring metrics are not as strong as those in enterprise platforms.
• Inflexible Pipeline Processes: Once you post a job with set stages, it's hard to change them. This limits flexibility for non-standard workflows.
• Not Suitable for High-Volume Sourcing: Recruitee emphasises collaborative hiring instead of multi-channel sourcing or large-scale CRM outreach.

Our Take

Recruitee is ideal for growing startups and mid-market teams focused on simplicity, collaboration, and employer branding. It's not suitable for those needing advanced sourcing, extensive reporting, or guaranteed pricing for legacy customers.

9. BambooHR

BambooHR is an integrated HRIS platform that combines HR management with an applicant tracking system. Designed for SMBs and mid-market companies, BambooHR shines when you need unified HR workflows.

Unlike Greenhouse, which focuses only on ATS, BambooHR includes recruiting as part of broader HR operations. This connects hiring, onboarding, payroll, performance management, and employee engagement smoothly.

Key Features of BambooHR

Below are the standout features of BambooHR, one of the best Greenhouse competitors:

• Integrated HRIS + ATS: Unified employee lifecycle from recruitment through payroll; no data silos or re-entry.
• Applicant Tracking System (ATS): Job posting, application management, collaborative hiring, pipeline tracking, and offer management.
• Employee Records & Onboarding: Centralized employee data, new hire workflows, digital document collection, and I-9 management.
• Time-Off Management: PTO requests, approvals, and accrual tracking integrated with ATS/HRIS.
• Performance Management: Goal tracking, reviews, and feedback (Advantage plan).
• Payroll Integration: Native integrations with payroll providers; hire-to-pay workflow with zero manual handoff.
• Mobile App: Employee self-service on mobile; managers approve time-off, PTO requests, and hiring from phone.
• Reporting & Compliance: Dashboards, custom reports, audit trails, and compliance data (EEO tracking, GDPR).
• Integrations: Marketplace of 100+ pre-built integrations; API access for custom connections.

BambooHR Pricing

Pros of BambooHR

• True HRIS + ATS Integration Eliminates Data Silos: Candidates move easily from ATS to HRIS. Payroll connects directly, so there’s no need for manual re-entry or integration issues.
• Intuitive Interface for HR Generalists: Non-technical HR teams find BambooHR simple to use. Onboarding, time-off, and employee records are easy to navigate.
• Native Payroll Integration: Unlike Greenhouse and Guidepoint, BambooHR’s payroll connector works seamlessly. The hire-to-pay workflow is smooth.
• Ideal for Companies with 20–100 Employees: The feature set and pricing suit SMBs well. It’s not overwhelming but also not limited to enterprises.
• Solid Mobile App for Employees: Self-service time-off requests, PTO visibility, and manager approvals work well on mobile devices.

Cons of BambooHR

• Limited ATS Feature Depth: It combines HR and ATS but lacks features like sourcing, AI screening, and advanced recruiting automation found in specialized platforms.
• Basic Performance Management: It doesn't have the sophistication of dedicated performance management tools. Users find that the approval workflows can be rigid.
• Limited Dashboard Customization: Some users say the dashboard options and analytics lack flexibility. There's little ability to customize views or drill down in reporting.
• Occasional Mobile and System Glitches: Users report random freezes and performance issues. Bugs can occur, and support may be slow during busy times.

Our Take

BambooHR is perfect for companies with 20–100 employees that need an integrated HRIS and ATS. It streamlines hire-to-pay processes but lacks advanced sourcing and screening, requiring extra tools for high-volume hiring.

10. Zoho Recruit

Zoho Recruit is an affordable, flexible ATS with a forever-free plan that makes recruiting software accessible to solopreneurs, agencies, and startups.

Part of the broader Zoho ecosystem, it combines ATS, CRM, resume parsing, AI candidate matching, interview scheduling, and SMS recruiting into one platform. Unlike Greenhouse's premium positioning, Zoho Recruit proves that powerful recruiting tools don't require enterprise budgets.

Key Features of Zoho Recruit

Below are the notable features of Zoho Recruit, one of the best Greenhouse alternatives:

• AI Candidate Matching: Intelligent matching using skill extraction and historical hiring data; rank candidates by fit (Professional+ plans).
• Resume Parsing & Skill Extraction: Automatic extraction of skills, experience, education, and certifications from resumes speeds up screening.
• Applicant Tracking System (ATS): Job posting, application management, pipeline tracking, collaborative hiring, and custom workflows.
• SMS & Voice Recruiting: Send campaigns via SMS; track engagement; follow-up calls integrated (Enterprise plan).
• Interview Scheduling: Calendar integration, availability syncing, and automated reminders; video interview support.
• Talent CRM: Candidate relationship management, talent pools, nurture campaigns, and prospect tracking.
• Integrations: 50+ pre-built integrations; native connectors to Slack, LinkedIn, Zapier, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and background check providers.
• Custom Modules & API: Build custom objects and workflows using API. Extensible for unique hiring processes.
• Reporting & Analytics: Customizable dashboards, hiring metrics, and recruitment KPIs.

Zoho Recruit Pricing

Pros of Zoho Recruit

• Forever Free Plan: No credit card needed. Great for freelancers, agencies with occasional hiring, or testing before committing. It's a true "try before you buy."
• Exceptional Affordability at All Tiers: At $25/user/month (annual billing = $300/year), it's 10 times cheaper than Greenhouse. The Enterprise plan at $75/month is still cheaper than Greenhouse's starting price.
• Highly Customizable Workflows: Create custom objects, fields, and workflows without coding. It adapts to your unique hiring processes better than rigid platforms.
• Solid Resume Parsing: AI extracts over 200 data points. This reduces manual resume review and has better feedback than Greenhouse.
• AI Candidate Matching (Professional+): Intelligent ranking cuts down manual screening. It learns from your hiring patterns over time.

Cons of Zoho Recruit

• Learning Curve for Advanced Features: Customizing Zoho requires time. It's not as easy to use as Workable or JazzHR right away.
• Limited Reporting Flexibility: You can make reports, but advanced analytics often need API work or creative solutions.
• Fewer Integrations Compared to Specialists: Zoho has over 50 integrations, which is good, but Greenhouse offers 450+, and Workable has a wider range of niche tools.
• Customer Support Varies: Zoho's support is available, but it's not as quick as that of other ATS vendors. The knowledge base can also be outdated.
• Scalability Questions for Enterprise: While it works at scale, it lacks some enterprise compliance and audit trail features found in Workday or iCIMS.

Our Take

Zoho Recruit is ideal for agencies, startups, and budget teams seeking custom workflows. Its free plan is excellent for smaller firms, while larger enterprises needing extensive support or rapid features should consider alternatives.

10 Additional Greenhouse Alternatives

Here are 10 more worthwhile Greenhouse competitors worth evaluating, comparing the ideal use case, trial availability, and key differentiators: